How do you like the weather today ? (original article written 2011)

…Catastrophic Weather Events Are Becoming the
New Normal.

Are You Ready for Life on Our Planet Circa 2011?

Or 2014 ??

by Bill McKibben

AlterNet (February 02 2011)

If you were in the space shuttle looking down yesterday, you would have

seen a pair of truly awesome, even fearful, sights.

Much of North America was obscured by a 2,000-mile storm dumping vast

quantities of snow from Texas to Maine – between the wind and snow,

forecasters described it as “probably the worst snowstorm ever to

Chicago, and said waves as high as 25 feet were rocking buoys on Lake


Meanwhile, along the shore of Queensland in Australia, the vast cyclone

Yasi was sweeping ashore; though the storm hit at low tide, the country’s

weather service warned that “the impact is likely to be more life

threatening than any experienced during recent generations”, especially

since its torrential rains are now falling on ground already flooded from

earlier storms. Here’s how Queensland premier Anna Bligh addressed her
people before the storm hit: “We know that the long hours ahead of you are

going to be the hardest that you face. We will be thinking of you every

minute of every hour between now and daylight and we hope that you can

feel our thoughts, that you will take strength from the fact that we are

keeping you close and in our hearts.”

Welcome to our planet, circa 2011 – a planet that, like some unruly

adolescent, has decided to test the boundaries. For two centuries now

we’ve been burning coal and oil and gas and thus pouring carbon into the

atmosphere; for two decades now we’ve been ignoring the increasingly

impassioned pleas of scientists that this is a Bad Idea. And now we’re

getting pinched.

Oh, there have been snowstorms before, and cyclones – our planet has

always produced extreme events. But by definition extreme events are

supposed to be rare, and all of a sudden they’re not. In 2010 nineteen

nations set new all-time temperature records (itself a record!) and when

the mercury hit 128 in early June along the Indus, the entire continent of

Asia set a new all-time temperature mark. Russia caught on fire; Pakistan

drowned. Munich Re, the biggest insurance company on earth, summed up the

annus horribilis last month with this clinical phrase: “the high number of

weather-related natural catastrophes and record temperatures both globally

and in different regions of the world provide further indications of

advancing climate change”.

You don’t need a PhD to understand what’s happening. That carbon we’ve

poured into the air traps more of the sun’s heat near the planet. And that

extra energy expresses itself in a thousand ways, from melting ice to

powering storms. Since warm air can hold more water vapor than cold, it’s

not surprising that the atmosphere is four percent moister than it was

forty years ago. That “four percent extra amount, it invigorates the

storms, it provides plenty of moisture for these storms”, said Kevin

Trenberth, head of the climate analysis section at the government’s

National Center for Atmospheric Research. It loads the dice for record

rain and snow. Yesterday the Midwest and Queensland crapped out.

The point I’m trying to make is: chemistry and physics work. We don’t just

live in a suburb, or in a free-market democracy; we live on an earth that

has certain rules. Physics and chemistry don’t care what John Boehner

thinks, they’re unmoved by what will make Barack Obama’s re-election

easier. More carbon means more heat means more trouble – and the trouble

has barely begun. So far we’ve raised the temperature of the planet about

a degree, which has been enough to melt the Arctic. The consensus

prediction for the century is that without dramatic action to stem the use

of fossil fuel – far more quickly than is politically or economically

convenient – we’ll see temperatures climb five degrees this century. Given

that one degree melts the Arctic, just how lucky are we feeling?

So far, of course, we haven’t taken that dramatic action – just the

opposite. The president didn’t even mention global warming in his State of

the Union address. He did promise some research into new technologies,

which will help down the line – but we’ll only be in a position to make

use of it if we get started right now with the technology we’ve already

got. And that requires, above all, putting a serious price on carbon. We

use fossil fuel because it’s cheap, and it’s cheap because Exxon Mobil and

Peabody Coal get to use the atmosphere as open sewer to dump their waste

for free. And today you can see the results of that particular business

model from outer space.

Overcoming that will require a movement – a movement that is slowly

beginning to build. In 2008 a few of us started from scratch to build a

campaign with an unlikely moniker: we called in, because a month

earlier this particular planet’s foremost climatologist, James Hansen, had

declared that we now knew how much carbon in the atmosphere was too much.

Any value higher than 350 parts per million, he said, was “not compatible

with the planet on which civilization developed and to which life on earth

is adapted”. That’s troubling news, because right now the atmosphere above

Chicago and Cairns and wherever you happen to be is about 390 parts per

million carbon dioxide. In other words, too much.

At the time, some of our environmentalist friends said that science was

too complicated for most people to get – that the only way to talk about

these issues was to simplify them. But we thought people could understand,

just as we understand when a doctor tells us our cholesterol is too high.

We may not know everything about the lipid system, but we know what ‘too

high’ means – it means we better change our diet, take our pill, lace up

our sneakers. And indeed has now coordinated almost 15,000

demonstrations in 188 countries, what Foreign Policy magazine called ‘the

largest ever coordinated global rally” about any issue.

That’s just a start, of course, and so far not enough to counter the power

of the fossil fuel industry, the most profitable enterprise humans have

ever engaged in. So we’ll keep building, and hoping others will join us.

But the good news is simple: more and more of this planet’s inhabitants

are remembering that they actually live on a planet.

We’ve been able to forget that fact for the last ten thousand years, the

period of remarkable climatic stability that underwrote the rise of

civilization. But we won’t be able to forget it much longer. Days like

yesterday will keep slapping us upside the head, until we take it in. The

third rock from the sun is a very different place than it used to be.


Bill McKibben is founder of, the Schumann Distinguished Scholar at

Middlebury College, and author most recently of Earth: Making a Life on a

Tough New Planet (2010).

2011 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: